Oh how that clock ticks ever faster forward! Taunting me to type faster.
So after much deliberation and consultation with James, my research objectives and questions were finally set in stone yesterday.
RO; To critically analyse the role of events in cultural regeneration in urban spaces
RQ1; To investigate the social impact of cultural events in areas of cultural regeneration
RQ2; To analyse the relationship between cultural events and cultural regeneration strategy and policy
My methodology is a multiple-embedded case study with inner East London as my subject. It was a round-about way we got there as I was first looking for a specific event as my 'case' but I am much happier with the locale at the centre of the paper instead as I can envision more angles from that viewpoint.
Now that I've got there after months of dancing around catch phrases and key terms it all seems strangely logical to me; so blatantly obvious in fact that I'm slightly perturbed that it took till the wire to get it out of me! (it always damn well does)
Looking at the majority of my colleagues topic choice the reflection of self and personal history is an undeniable theme.
My initial response to the notion of writing something 'close to home', were less than favourable. I wanted to reach further afield, challenge myself more, learn something new! I mean, for Christ's sake, I wanted to go to Serbia!
And then I realised the importance of two things. Passion and understanding. Yes, if I wanted to spend a couple of years researching, learn the language, immerse myself in the culture, take up residence for a time I could probably write an truly insightful and critical paper on Exit, or Carnival or Avignon for that matter, and yes, the purpose of research IS to learn and discover.
However, the depth I will get from writing on something I've already been immersed in, have an opinion on and have unwittingly researched in daily conversation over the last 5 years will undoubtedly be better. Particularly with consideration to the fact this is my first time doing any research of this nature and not starting from total scratch is probably a good thing.
There is no way a paper of mine would compare to Beka's on Bonnaroo or Muriel's on Taiwan Aborigines simply because of their past experiences would place them in such an advantageous position over I.
So yes, it makes sense to me now, and I'm happy I'm on that path.
That all being said though, those of us writing on the familiar or affiliated, must maintain a close monitor on ourselves that our research remains as authentic and objective as possible. I suppose an element of subjectivity will always slip in somewhere and will have more tendency to do so if writing on an area of personal connection. I personally don't believe true objectivity exists to be honest - it's unachievable in totality as we are influenced subjects ourselves, however, it can be strived for.
The most important element to me however, is passion. I do believe you need to care about what you're writing on, even from an objective perspective. Perhaps not by birthright, but a proud east London resident all the same. I've lived everywhere from Stoke Newington to Stepney, Hoxton to Haggerston and a few more stops in between and have a genuine care and interest in the history, culture and society of this part of London, and that is why I'm happy to have finally arrived at the decision to write on it.... oh... and events of course.
Oh those minutes are still a ticking so the queen of cram must once more put her head back down and get back to writing.... you will undoubtedly see me again before the final deadline falls.